Catherine (Burkel) Grammel (1845 - 1912)*

According to the immigration documentation that I have accepted as the most likely match for Sebastian Burkel, he had a single child before he and his wife, Catherine, emigrated to the United States in 1847. That child, a daughter also named Catherine, is listed as two years old in December of 1847 which would put her birth date in 1845.
Catherine is listed on the census in 1860 as 15 years old. By the time of the next census, in 1870 she is no longer listed with the family. She would have been 25 years old by then.
I had assumed that she had been married at some point between 1860 and 1870. It was not until this past year that my assumption was proven correct by the release of  more Michigan marriage listings on Ancestry.com.
On 9 Nov 1869 Catherine Burkel was married to Louis "Grimel" of Royal Oak, MI. They were wed at St. Mary's Church. Catherine's brother Anthony "Anton" Burkel was a witness along with Josephina "Schobe". The place of birth for both Catherine and Louis is listed as France, and Louis is listed as a Farmer. (See Below)

Detail of marriage record for Catherine Burkel and Louis Grimel - 9 Nov 1869

With each year the census documents include more and more information. That is why finding the marriage information for Catherine was so important. Without her married name I lost track of her after 1860. I had no way to tell what had happened in her adult life, or if she even survived past the age of 15.
On the 1870 census "Kate" and Louis "Gremmal" are listed as living in the township of Royal Oak. Their estate was worth a modest $1400.00 (Compared to Sebastian's $2400.00). They both have parents of foreign birth. By 1880 "Catarina" and "Loui Grammel" were listed as living in Detroit, Wayne, MI. Both of them list their own, plus their mother and father's birthplace as France. Loui's occupation is listed as "Dealing in Wood" which likely meant he was a carpenter. Catherine's occupation is listed as "Keeping House". (Interesting that they considered this an occupation in 1880!) There are no children listed.

Census for Louis and Catherine Grammel, 1870

In the census from 1900 Catherine  "Kate" is listed as 55 years old, her birth year is 1845 and she has been married to Louis for 31 years. They lived in Royal Oak, MI. According to the census, Louis immigrated in 1854 and became a naturalized citizen. Catherine's immigration year is listed as 1848 and she is not listed as a naturalized citizen. Under "mother of how many children" there appears to be a very faint number 1. Under "number of those children living" there is a very clear "0". The nativity of Catherine, Louis and both of their parents is listed as France. They can both read, write and speak English. Louis owns his home "free" meaning it is not mortgaged. Neither of them have an occupation listed.
By 1910 "Katherine" and "Loius Grammel" were still living in Royal Oak. Most of the information is similar to, but slightly different from what was listed in previous years. The nativity of Louis, Catherine, and their parents is now listed  as "France Ger" instead of France. Catherine's immigration year is listed as 1865. Neither of them are listed as having an occupation, Louis is listed as living on his "own account". They both speak English and can read and write. In the 1900 census, Louis is listed as owning his house, now he is listed as owning a home that includes a farm. There is a space for veteran of the Civil War, and in this space there is a very faintly written "19" for Louis. There is also a "9" in the space for blind and an "X" in the space for deaf and dumb. On this census it is more clear that Catherine had at least one child, and it did not survive.

Census for Louis and Catherine Grammel, 1910

After the 1910 census I have not been able to locate any further information for Catherine. Louis was married again on 6 Nov 1913 to Mary Bower of Macomb Co. My guess is that Catherine passed away sometime between 1910 and 1913.
There is a death certificate for someone named "Esther Gremmel" of Royal Oak. She was born in 1846 in France. Her mother is listed as Catherine "Shope" and her father is listed as John Rusie, and he was born in Michigan. I feel like, even though some of the information does not match up, this might be Catherine. Sometimes the records don't always match. For instance, the marriage record of Louis Grammel and Mary Bower seems to be attached to the wrong "next" page. (See below) As you follow across the page, it looks like the lines do not match up. I am wondering if this could be the reason that there is some matching and non-matching information in the death record for "Esther". For instance, it seems odd that she would have been born in France, but her father was born in Michigan.
So, for the death record the last name, residence, mother's first and last name, birth place and year are all a close match. Since Louis remarried in 1913 I have accepted (for now) that Catherine passed away in 1912.

Detail of marriage record for Louis Grammel and Mary Bower

Anthony (Anton) Burkel (1849 - 1918)

Anthony (Anton) Burkel was born sometime between 1845 and 1850. He was the first son of Sebastian and Catherine Burkel. He was also the first of my particular branch of "Burkel's" to be born in the United States. Although I have been unable to find an exact date of birth for Anthony, the 1870 census lists him as being 21 years old in July of that year. That would put his date of birth around 1849.
The census of 1870 lists Anthony as working on the family farm in Greenfield Township in SE Michigan. The census of 1880 also lists him as working on the farm, but in a column to denote "Sick" persons Anthony is listed as having "Asma". The relevance of this information did not dawn on me until later in my investigation.
From information from the Michigan "Wills and Probate"database I was able to locate copies of the settlement of Sebastian Burkel's estate. The initial documents were filed on 12 Jun 1884, but it looks like the estate was not settled until October of 1889. Since Anthony was the eldest son, he served as executor of the estate. After all was said and done each of the brothers (Anthony, Aloysious, Joseph, and August) received the sum of $125.00. This would have been about $3289.47 in today's dollars.

Signature of Anthony Burkel as appeared on Will and Probate documentation for the estate of Sebastian Burkel

At some point (presumably following his inheritance) Anthony moved to Colorado. In 1893 Anthony is listed in the Denver, CO city directory. He lived at 934 10th street. He was still in Denver by the next year, but had moved to room #3 at 1466 S. 10th street. He moved again before the directory was published in 1895 (945 11th Street). 

The next 10 years of Anthony's life are not well documented, but in 1905 he is listed as an employee of the St. Anthony's Hospital on W. 16th Ave. (between Quitman and Raleigh) in Denver. He was a resident of the hospital working as a staff gardener. 

From the 1910 census I learned that Anthony was single, still working and living at the hospital. The census lists his parent's birthplace as Germany. He was a wage earner, and he could read and write. There is also a column on this census that denotes Civil War veterans. There is a #4 in this space next to Anthony's name. 

Initially, I assumed that the #4 in the space meant that Anthony had served in the Civil War for 4 years. When I did the math, this did not make a lot of sense. If Anthony was born in 1849 - he would only have been 11 years old at the start of the war. I searched the Civil War veteran database for his name - and I did find the name "Anton Burkel" who was a soldier for the Confederacy that had been taken prisoner. Was this our Anthony? Maybe he was part of a drum and fife corps or maybe he lied about his age (which was not unprecedented). 

In 1911 Anthony was still at the hospital working as a "driver". In 1912-13 he is listed again as a gardener. Anthony died on 8 Aug 1918. He is buried in Mount Olivet Cemetery at Wheat Ridge in Jefferson County, CO. (Section 10, Block 5) Someone made sure that he was buried and had a monument to his life. 

Monument for Anthony Burkel 1849 - 1918 at Mount Olivet Cemetery at Wheat Ridge in Jefferson County, Colorado

Two facts about Anthony were interesting to me: first - why did he move to Denver, Colorado? Second, was he really a Civil War veteran?
An article from the Denver Post (Tuberculosis in Colorado History) helped shed some light on a

"It was a widely held belief that by 1900 'one-third of Colorado’s population possible reason for Anthony's move to Denver:were residents of the state because of tuberculosis,' Fresh air, year-round sunshine, low humidity and the higher elevations provided relief from the symptoms ... according to a doctoral dissertation by history scholar Cynthia Stout."

The symptoms of Tuberculosis are similar to the symptoms of Asthma. Recall that Anthony is listed on the 1880 census as having "Asma". Perhaps (2nd Great) Uncle Anthony traveled to Denver with the hopes that the change in climate would help minimize the symptoms of his sickness. It is possible that he may even have been suffering from Tuberculosis (or Consumption as it was called then) and it had been misdiagnosed on the 1880 census.
The hospital that Anthony worked for (St. Anthony's) began as a sanatorium for Tuberculosis patients. As the population in Denver began to swell the need for hospitals and places to house the sick grew. In 1884 seven nuns arrived from Lafayette, Indiana. As part of the newly formed "American Branch of the Poor Sisters of St. Francis Seraph of Perpetual Adoration" the sisters worked tirelessly with the sick. They also raised enough money to open a hospital that was dedicated 13 Jan 1893. It was here that Anthony lived until he died in August 1918.

Photo from St. Anthony's Hospital, Denver CO. Website

Trying to determine if Anthony truly was a veteran of the Civil War ended up being much easier than I had anticipated. Knowing that he was only 11 years old at the start of the war made it seem unlikely that he had served. Additionally, Michigan was decidedly part of the Union. Anthony would have had to "switch sides" to be part of the Confederacy.

For the last several years I have conducted my ancestry investigations using Ancestry.com. They charge a monthly fee - which I gladly pay. Over the years the amount of information that I have had access to has more than doubled. The website is constantly expanding their databases.

A few weeks ago I was finally able to solve the mystery of Uncle Anthony's alleged Civil War service. Believe it or not, there was a second "Anthony Burkel" who was from Louisiana! His real name was "Antoine F. Burkel" and he was born in 1845. His was the name I had seen on the Civil War Muster rolls and prisoner lists. At some point following the war Antoine moved to Illinois (just outside of Chicago). He lived there with his wife, Alice, until he died in 1893.

At this point I do not have enough information to determine if this branch of Burkels are blood relatives. Recently, there have been a few Burkels from New Orleans that have popped up on my ancestry radar. It is possible that these are relatives, but I may never know for sure.

Mary B. (Kempel) Merline (1866 - 1951)

Mary B Kempel was born on 23 Mar. 1866. She was the first child of Kunnigunde (Stenglein) Kempel and Lorenz Kempel. In 1870 at 4 years old she was living in the second precinct, sixth ward in the city of Detroit. Her father was a "Wagon-maker" and her mother took care of the house and the children. The census confirms that the family was still living in Detroit in 1880, but there is not enough information to determine where in the city they lived. It is likely that Mary lived with the family until she married John Merline in 1888.
John Merline was likely the only son of Vincent Merline and Anna W. (Holtzmeir) Merline. He was born in Bath, Steuben County New York in 1858. At some point the Merline family, including Vincent and Anna and two daughters: Barbara and Caroline, moved to Detroit. John found work as a painter. He married Mary Kempel on 24 Jan 1888. They were married by a pastor (not a priest) and the witnesses were John Schuster and Caroline Merline. Mary gave birth to their first son, Raymond M. Merline on 30 Nov. 1888 in "Wayne" Michigan. Records indicate that the Merlines all lived together at 94 Calhoun street in Detroit.
Unfortunately, John died on 6 Nov 1891. Mary was about seven months pregnant with their second child when he passed away. It is likely that Mary and John suffered the loss of a child between the birth of their first and second sons. (The census from 1910 states that Mary was the mother of three children with two surviving.)  John Vincent Merline, their second son, was born on 7 Jan 1892. In 1893 Mary, her two sons, two sisters-in-law, and mother and father-in-law still lived together at 94 Calhoun St. in Detroit. Mary's sisters-in-law Barbara and Carrie had begun a business called "Merline Sisters Dressmakers" that seems to have been run out of the home on 94 Calhoun St.

This photo is most likely to be Mary Merline and Winifred K. Kempel (My Great Grandmother). I am not sure of the date of the photgraph, but Mary seems to be in mourning clothes. If this is true than the photo would have been taken in the 1890's.  

Between 1895 and 1899 Mary and her two sons moved with the Merlines to a rented property at 232 Erskine st. between Brush St. and John R. in Detroit. Records indicate that during this time Barbara, Carrie and Mary were all employed as dressmakers - probably still on their own as the Merline Sisters.
The 1900 census shows that Mary and her sons had moved to 578 St. Antoine St. in Detroit. Her father-in-law, Vincent died on 19 Nov 1900 leaving his wife, Anna as a widow. Mary's sons were 12 and 8 and it seems as though she was able to afford to live on her own. The photograph below - I believe it to be Mary, was taken by Chas. Hopp & Co. a photographer in Detroit between 1899 - 1925.

Believed to be Mary B. (Kempel) Merline c. 1899 - 1925

It seems as though Mary was able to live on her own with her sons for about two years. At some point between 1901 and 1903 she moved back to the address at 232 Erskine with her sister-in-law Barbara and her mother-in-law. Mary is listed in the Detroit city directory that year as Mrs. Mary Merline, Dressmaker.

By 1905 Raymond was 17 years old. He had already obtained a position as a clerk for the Detroit branch of R. G. Dun and Co. which was the first credit reporting agency. On 15 Aug 1905 Mary's mother-in-law Anna passed away. Also, during 1905 Raymond changed jobs to work for the American Car and Foundry Co. as a clerk.

Between 1906 and 1910 Mary, Barbara, Raymond and John all lived together at 232 Erskine in Detroit. By 1910 Raymond had begun work at the US Post Office as a clerk, and John was working as a clerk in an auto factory. Mary and Barbara are still listed as dressmakers. 

By 1920 Mary had moved to 1291 Helen St. in Detroit. The census indicates that she owned the home, and was still working as a dressmaker. It is unclear if she was still partnering with her sister-in-law, Barbara. John was working as an accountant at Price Waterhouse, and Raymond (who lived at 1293 Helen St.) was also working as an accountant at Monarch Fdy. Co. 

At some point between 1920 and 1930 Mary stopped working and on the 1940 census she is listed as being unable to work. She would have been 74 years old. She lived with Raymond, his wife and four children in 1940. There is not much information past this point, and Mary died on 8 Apr 1951.

Photo also believed to be Mary Merline - Date unknown

It seems to me that Mary must have worked hard to provide a comfortable life for herself and her sons. Raymond seems to have maintained steady work as a bookkeeper, even during the depression. He married Cora M. Forton on 15 Nov 1915 and they had four children: Raymond J (1916); Rosalie M (1919); Barbara (1923) and John R. (1929). John also maintained steady work, also in an accounting field. He married Teresa M. Schnoll on 19 June 1918 and they had three children of which two survived infancy: Philip (1919 - 1919); Mary E. (1921) and John V Jr. (1922). 

When I was putting together Mary's history over the last few years I could not help but to feel a connection to her. For my whole life I had been interested in fashion and clothing construction and design, and here was someone in my ancestry who had made a living at it. Also, as was probably true for many women of that time - I am sure it was not easy to make a living on her own and provide enough for her sons to be well-educated. Mary also fits a recurring theme I am finding on both sides of my family tree: strong women. She suffered almost unbearable hardship - but she continued on and with the support of her family, she was a useful member of society who contributed through her work and through her sons.
As I was researching Mary I came to a terrible realization, however; there is almost nothing left to attest to her existence. I have put every address that she ever lived at into google maps and came up with either a vacant lot, or a street address that no longer exists. She does not even have a grave stone to mark her grave in Mount Elliot Cemetery in Detroit. She is at least mentioned on her husband John Merline's stone. 
This serves as a reminder to me that although we are often times the center of our own world while we are alive, when we are gone, after a long time there may be nothing left but a few photos and some people who wish they had met you.

94 Calhoun St. Dearborn, MI

232 Erskine St. Detroit, MI

1291 Helen St. Detroit, MI

578 St. Antoine St. Detroit, MI

Sebastian Burkel (1809 - 1882)

The patriarch of the "Burkel" family of Southeastern Michigan is (most likely) Sebastian Burkel. Sebastian entered the United States on 2 December 1847. The early movements of the patriarch of our family in the US are unknown.  It is even possible that he may have entered the US before this date. There is another record of a “Sebastien Berkle” who arrived in New York on 13 Oct 1834. “Sebastien” is listed as a 24 year old farmer from Wurtemberg in Germany. 

Detail from emigration ledger; 2 Dec 1847 - (You can just barely make out the name "Burkel" from the upper right - next to the number 2)

The first official recording of Sebastian other than the immigration ledger is the census of 1860. In June of that year Sebastian, together with his wife Catherine (41 years old) and their children Catherine (15), Antony (11) and Aloysius (7) lived on a farm in Hamtramck Michigan. The valuation of the farm at the time of the census was $1000.00 (about $28,000.00 in current money). It seemed like the farm was small, but respectable. Other estates valued on the census were anywhere between $400 – $ 31,000 with the average being about $1500.

Detail from Census of 1860

It is likely that a move may have taken place after 1860 because the historical borders of Hamtramck had not changed between 1860 and 1870; however, the 1870 census confirms that the family was now living in the township of Greenfield in Wayne County, Michigan. This time period is well documented. The census indicates that Sebastian (61) and Catherine (51) were both born in France. Sebastian was a farmer who employed two of his sons Antony (21) and “Aloies” (17) as farm hands. Joseph (10) and August (7) also appeared for the first time on this census. The record indicates that neither Joseph nor August was enrolled in school, but there are no marks on the page at all for school enrolment. (It could have been an accidental omission by the enumerator.) By this time the younger Catherine (who would have been 25 years old) was no longer living in the household.

Detail from Census of 1870

On a historical map (1876) of Wayne County the Burkel family farm is located in section 4 in the center of the northernmost area of Greenfield Township. (See separate map of Greenfield Township) The farm was about 30 acres and seems to have a small body of water (either a river or stream) that transects the southernmost area of the property. At the time of the census the farm and Sebastian’s personal estate were valued at about $1900.00 and $500.00 (about $34,000 and $8900 in current money). According to these numbers Sebastian almost doubled the value of his farm and quintupled the value of his personal estate in only ten years.

Historical Map of Wayne County, 1876

Historical Map of Greenfield Township, 1876 (The farm of Sebastian Burkel can be found in the third "row" of farms from the top, below "T.H. Hinchman" and next to "A.Gittre". Click on image or right click to open in a new window to see it better.)

It is important to note that the American Industrialist Henry Ford was also born in Greenfield Township during this period. Indeed, Henry was born (30 July 1863) about one month before August Burkel (28 August 1863).  

The Ford’s farm was located about 12 miles southwest of the Burkel family farm. Some of the Ford family farms are listed on the map of Greenfield Township under “S. Ford” and is split into two 40 acre properties. It can be found on the map in section 30. This farm may have belonged to Samuel Ford (1837-1889) and at some point it was shared with Henry Ford’s father – William. Additionally, Henry Ford’s future wife Clara Jane Bryant also lived in Greenfield Township with her parents Melvin and Martha Bryant. Their family farm can be found in section 20.
The farm that is listed as belonging to Henry Ford's father William Ford is actually located in Springwells Township according to these maps. I have created a composite map of Greenfield and Springwells Townships where the "W. Ford" and "S. Burkell" farms are outlined in red. 

Composite map of Greenfield and Springwells Township, 1876. Outlined in red - uppermost is farm of "S. Burkell" lowermost is farms of "Wm. Ford".

Little is known about Sebastian prior to his arrival in the USA on 2 December 1847. Even the absolute origin of Sebastian and his wife Catherine are uncertain. The passenger list from the ship Splendid lists 38 year old Sebastian as being a farmer from Bavaria, but census entries from 1860 to 1880 list Sebastian’s birthplace as France and finally, the death records for Sebastian indicate that he was born in Germany.

It is possible that the history of the Lorraine region is to blame for these discrepancies. Prior to 1766 the area had been settled by the Romans, Germans, and the French. In 1618 the Thirty Years War decimated the region and took almost half of the population with it. At the end of the war the region was considered French territory but was settled by people from Switzerland, Burgundy, Savoy, French-Comte, and Germany.  Lorraine became a French province in 1766. The population was mixed – and the northern regions were largely Germanic.

In 1871 the territory was overtaken by the German Empire and combined with Alsace to form the Imperial state Alsace-Lorraine. The region stayed part of Germany until the Treaty of Versailles (1919) which returned the territory to France. Lorraine has remained part of France except for a brief period of 4 years during the German annexation (occupation) during the Second World War. 

Even the spelling of the Burkel surname is inconsistent. The original immigration list spells the name as Buckel. The 1860, 1870, and 1880 US Census spells the name Birckell, Barkel, and Bikle respectively.

The origin of the name is German and is considered to be a “pet form of one of the various personal names beginning with the element Burg- or Burk- for example: Burkhard” (Ancestry.com) In some cases the name is spelled with an umlaut: Bürkel. It is possible that this is the correct spelling. When the Alsace-Lorrain territory was ceded to Germany under the Treaty of Frankfurt in May of 1871 people were allowed to petition to maintain French citizenship. A list of people from the Moselle region (north) of Lorraine includes 18 Burkels. Three of these spelled the surname with the umlaut.

 

The picture above is a fragment of the Siebmacher’s Coat of Arms book. This book is considered to be the definitive collection of German heraldry. The collection includes over 100 volumes which were published in a series spanning over 100 years beginning in 1855. “Each volume contains detailed illustrations of coats of arms with text descriptions of the coat of arms and the families and other entities that bore this coat of arms. Among the families who had the coat of arms included noble families, but also bourgeois (upper middle class). The information about these families may include biographical data and sometimes even family tree charts. Entities that had the coat of arms included principalities, cities, bishoprics, abbeys, etc.”

“This work includes the following areas: the German Empire, the Austrian-Hungarian Empire and some other parts of Europe. The coat of arms shown in these volumes date from the 12th to the early 20th Century.”

The database also makes the following disclaimer: (Translated from German) “Note: As with all genealogical research needs to be here with care to associate certain records in this database with certain people in your family tree. In this database you can find family names that are identical or similar to those of your ancestors. Just because the names are the same, this does not necessarily mean that you are descended from noble or royal families, or that the family coat of arms also your family belongs. Please investigate carefully to check connections between individuals and the families who had the coat of arms.”

The description of the crest includes that the shield is divided with a birch tree sitting atop three mountains. The helmet is crowned and there are two horns divided with a black grouse in the center. The crest is traced back to Johann Burkel, 1614.

An inquiry into the possible meaning behind the symbols turned up some interesting details. For instance, the closed helmet indicates that the crest was not of noble origin; however the crown atop the helmet appears to be that of a Marquis. The Marquis title is typically associated with France and ranks below a duke and above an earl in the order of the peerage. In German heraldry the closed helmet indicates a rank of Burgher. The grouse most likely is a symbol for the name. A grouse is also referred to as a Moor-lock which has something to do with the root of the name Berks-. On the shield the tree symbolizes antiquity and strength and the type of tree (birch) symbolizes new beginnings.  The three mountains symbolize one who provides safety, refuge and protection.

Unfortunately, I have never been able to discover an exact date of birth for Sebastian. Most records indicate that he was born around 1809. There is a record of the birth of a child called "Sebastianus Birkle" at Altdorf, Freiburg, Baden on 17 May 1809. The child was born to Francisci Josephi Birkle and Mariae Rosae (Dietz) Birkle. This region is near the border between France and Germany - but it would have been closer to Alsace, not Lorraine. 
It is possible that this record matches Sebastian, but his death record lists his parents as Casper and Magdaline Berkle - both listed as being born in Germany. 
The only things I can be reasonable certain of is that Sebastian was born either in France or Germany in the first decade of the nineteenth century. He came to America before 1860, and built a farm in SE Michigan. He raised a daughter, Catherine and four sons, Antony, Aloysius, Joseph and August. He died 21 May 1882. 
I do have one photograph that I believe may be Sebastian. The photograph (Below)  is marked form the Studios of Frederick Lutge from 53 Monroe St. in Detroit. This means that the photo was taken between 1863 and 1893. I believe that the older man may be Sebastian, the woman may be Catherine. The young man standing to Left may even be August. I do not have an idea for the identities of the other two children, but I think they may be grand children. 

Possible photograph of Sebastian and Catherine Burkel.